Michał Kopeć
474630e2bb
Graft keeps a derived, disposable code graph in sync with a content hash rather than a calendar, and keeps a protected block on every regenerated node. This KB is the opposite kind of store — durable, curated, built from material that cannot be regenerated — but several of Graft's mechanisms port cleanly, and two of them close real gaps here. Schema 1.5 is additive: every 1.4 page remains valid. 1. `## Crux` — verbatim source excerpts alongside the synthesis. A summary can drift silently; a quote either still matches its source or it does not. Lets `ckb-retrieve` ground an answer without a round-trip to the archive, and makes drift mechanically detectable. 2. `## Notes` — human-authored and protected everywhere. Closes a real gap: `ckb-index-external` regenerates connector pages wholesale, so an annotation written there was previously destroyed on the next refresh. 3. `source_fingerprint`/`source_checked` — a digest of the material a page was built from. Freshness by date says a page has aged; a fingerprint says whether its evidence moved. Most valuable for connector-backed libs, where documents change with no notice. 4. `lint_report.py --quick` — a deterministic one-line session-start signal, wired into Rule E next to the existing `git status` check. 5. In-degree as a rank-fusion signal in `ckb-retrieve`, weighted below 1.0: centrality is a prior, not evidence. 6. Blast radius — a new `ckb-ingest` step walking the graph backwards from touched entities to find what the incoming material contradicts, before writing anything. Ingest was additive-first, which is how a wiki accumulates two pages that quietly disagree. 7. Edge vocabulary in `wiki/graph/index.md` rewritten as a question per verb, and completed: `part_of` was written by `ckb-code-map` but never declared. Added `produces`, `configures`, `validates`, `implements`. Lint gains checks 12 (fingerprint drift), 13 (crux verbatimness) and 14 (the protected-Notes rule), verified against a synthetic fixture covering stale digests, missing sources, fabricated quotes and paraphrased evidence. Not adopted: the gitignored regenerable store, the MCP server and CLI daemon, tree-sitter parsing, statusline hooks, telemetry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
55 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
# 2026-09-21 Session Summary
|
|
|
|
## [2026-09-21] Analysis — Graft (trailhq/Graft) vs. this KB structure
|
|
|
|
- **Type:** read-only analysis. No `wiki/` writes, so no `wiki/log.md` entry.
|
|
- **Read:** `wiki/index.md`, `wiki/graph/index.md`, `wiki/entities/index.md`,
|
|
`.agents/skills/ckb-retrieve/SKILL.md`, `.agents/skills/ckb-lint/SKILL.md`,
|
|
`.agents/modules/software/skills/ckb-code-map/SKILL.md`, repo tree.
|
|
- **External source:** <https://github.com/trailhq/Graft> (README, fetched 2026-09-21).
|
|
- **Finding:** Graft is a *derived, disposable* code-context graph (tree-sitter pass +
|
|
optional LLM pass, gitignored, regenerated per developer); CKB is a *durable, curated*
|
|
knowledge layer over non-regenerable material. Architectures are not competitors.
|
|
- **Seven portable ideas identified**, ranked: (1) verbatim `## Crux`/evidence excerpts
|
|
in pages; (2) protected `## Notes` block on agent-regenerated pages; (3) content-hash
|
|
fingerprints on `## Sources` for mechanical staleness; (4) cheap deterministic
|
|
pre-pass + a `ckb check` freshness signal at session start; (5) graph in-degree as a
|
|
rank-fusion signal in `ckb-retrieve`; (6) blast-radius pass during ingest;
|
|
(7) complete + question-oriented edge vocabulary in `wiki/graph/index.md`.
|
|
- **Defect spotted:** `wiki/graph/index.md` documents `uses`/`depends_on`/`caused`/
|
|
`contradicts`/`supersedes` but omits `part_of`, which `ckb-code-map` Step 6 writes.
|
|
- **Rejected as non-portable:** gitignored/regenerable store, MCP server + CLI daemon,
|
|
tree-sitter parsing, statusline/hooks, telemetry.
|
|
- **Status:** analysis only, no changes proposed to disk yet. Awaiting user decision on
|
|
which ideas to implement.
|
|
- **Git:** branch `main` clean at session start; this summary is the only new file.
|
|
|
|
## [2026-09-21] Implementation — Graft ideas 1-7 on branch `graft-ideas`
|
|
|
|
Branched from `main` at c998489. Schema bumped 1.4 -> 1.5 (additive; every 1.4
|
|
page stays valid). VERSION 1.7.0 -> 1.8.0.
|
|
|
|
| # | Idea | Where it landed |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1 | `## Crux` verbatim evidence | `AGENTS.md` §2, `ckb-ingest` Step 5, `ckb-decide`, `ckb-retrieve` Step 6 shortcut, lint check 13 |
|
|
| 2 | Protected `## Notes` | `AGENTS.md` §2, `ckb-index-external` regeneration rule, `ckb-code-map`, lint check 14 |
|
|
| 3 | Source fingerprints | `source_fingerprint`/`source_checked` frontmatter, `ckb-ingest`, `ckb-index-external` (etag/mtime/sha256), `ckb-decide`, lint check 12 |
|
|
| 4 | Cheap pre-pass + `ckb check` | `lint_report.py --quick`, wired into Rule E at session start; `ckb-index-external` skips unchanged docs by fingerprint |
|
|
| 5 | In-degree rank fusion | `ckb-retrieve` Step 3 builds the list, Step 4 fuses at weight ~0.5; `in_degree()` in the lint script surfaces hubs |
|
|
| 6 | Blast radius | new `ckb-ingest` Step 4 (reverse graph walk, confirms/extends/contradicts/untouched + owners), reported in Step 8 |
|
|
| 7 | Edge vocabulary | `wiki/graph/index.md` rewritten as a question-per-verb table; added `part_of` (the live inconsistency with `ckb-code-map`), `produces`, `configures`, `validates`, `implements` |
|
|
|
|
Also updated for consistency: `ckb-init`/`ckb-reset` (graph vocabulary is now
|
|
scaffold contract, copied verbatim), `ckb-upgrade` (new step b2, the 1.4->1.5
|
|
migration), `ckb-export-okf` (two new passthrough fields), `README.md`,
|
|
`README.pl.md`, `MANUAL.md`, `MANUAL.pl.md`, `wiki/overview.md`.
|
|
|
|
**Verification:** new lint checks exercised against a synthetic fixture in the
|
|
scratchpad — a good page (clean), a page with a stale digest + missing file +
|
|
missing fingerprint + a fabricated quote, and a page with a paraphrased Crux.
|
|
All five findings fired, the good page produced none. Repo's own wiki lints
|
|
clean; both exporters run clean.
|
|
|
|
**Not done:** ideas beyond 1-7 (Graft's token-budgeted `map` view was idea 8
|
|
and out of scope). No wiki content was fingerprinted, because this wiki is an
|
|
empty scaffold — the conventions take effect on the next ingest.
|